Actually the law of averages is what I'm referring to.
Which would be better? Do you think standing on line at the lotto spot and making a donation with a chance of five million to one is a good idea? Is that chance you'll get compensated worth while? Perhaps if you spend two dollars per day, you'll succeed in receiving the jack pot because the guy on TV said so.
Hey you never know unless you evaluate carefully.
Emotions are incredible.
Show a person"s picture, play music simultaneously and there's a whole world of wondrous thought that can be conveyed.
You can make folk believe in untouchable bubble gum dreams.
There's truth in the law of averages but who cares when their fancy is being tickled? A choice between three to one odds or a million to one odds, leaves me with a conclusion.
My conclusion is actually a well calculated process.
Affiliate marketing may be conceived as having three to one odds for success, however with more understanding, the gap between one and three can become a solid one.
There are relatively easy ways to control marketing averages.
You may have heard the popular sales slogan, "It's all about the numbers.
" "It's a numbers game.
" That's another sales slogan.
The meaning of these slogans relate to the fact that a sale is basically dependent upon averages.
You can depend on a three percent average sale when conditions are proper.
What is proper? Proper can be different depending upon what industry we're working with.
What I'm saying is out of one hundred prospects, at least three of them will make a purchase.
This is the direct marketing and internet marketing standard.
A three percent return is considered average.
What's a sale, prospect, market or industry? Define these things and you have something controllable.
In other words, you have a controllable business.
Operate at home and you have a controllable business with very little over head.
Go buy a Lotto Ticket and you have at least five million to one odds at making money.
Which do you prefer? I think the winner is more than obvious.
Which would be better? Do you think standing on line at the lotto spot and making a donation with a chance of five million to one is a good idea? Is that chance you'll get compensated worth while? Perhaps if you spend two dollars per day, you'll succeed in receiving the jack pot because the guy on TV said so.
Hey you never know unless you evaluate carefully.
Emotions are incredible.
Show a person"s picture, play music simultaneously and there's a whole world of wondrous thought that can be conveyed.
You can make folk believe in untouchable bubble gum dreams.
There's truth in the law of averages but who cares when their fancy is being tickled? A choice between three to one odds or a million to one odds, leaves me with a conclusion.
My conclusion is actually a well calculated process.
Affiliate marketing may be conceived as having three to one odds for success, however with more understanding, the gap between one and three can become a solid one.
There are relatively easy ways to control marketing averages.
You may have heard the popular sales slogan, "It's all about the numbers.
" "It's a numbers game.
" That's another sales slogan.
The meaning of these slogans relate to the fact that a sale is basically dependent upon averages.
You can depend on a three percent average sale when conditions are proper.
What is proper? Proper can be different depending upon what industry we're working with.
What I'm saying is out of one hundred prospects, at least three of them will make a purchase.
This is the direct marketing and internet marketing standard.
A three percent return is considered average.
What's a sale, prospect, market or industry? Define these things and you have something controllable.
In other words, you have a controllable business.
Operate at home and you have a controllable business with very little over head.
Go buy a Lotto Ticket and you have at least five million to one odds at making money.
Which do you prefer? I think the winner is more than obvious.