Crude Oil Doesn"t Explode, Although It Does Burn
Perhaps, you enjoy debunking conspiracy theories as much as I do.
Well, the other day I was reading Conspiracy Theory Magazine - "they have a magazine for that you ask," yes, indeed they do.
On the first page was a reminder having to do with Ockham's Razor - namely that the highest probability is that the answer to solving any unknown is merely thinking about the most probably and likely explanation.
Sure, but what happens when nothing jives? Ah, this is what makes for the best conspiracy theories because "plausible deniability" goes right the hell out of the window.
Let's talk.
You see, when rail cars full of crude oil explode and blow up, something is amiss.
There was a powerful article in the Wall Street Journal on January 3, 2014 titled; "US Issues Alert On Bakken Crude," by Russell Gold which noted the rail crashes which have occurred, where the rail cars exploded in a big fireball.
There is only one problem with that, they had "crude oil" in them and anyone that knows much about chemistry knows that crude oil doesn't explode, it does burn, but it doesn't explode.
So, why did it explode? Ah, the 64 million dollar question indeed.
You see, I see a conspiracy theory in all of this - namely that there is a bit of terrorism going on here.
But who would do such a thing? Well, how about Al Qaeda? How about wealthy Royal Members of the House of Saud funding proxy Al Qaeda members, they've done it to serve their political will elsewhere.
Okay, well then if so, why would they do that you ask? Well, remember I am just playing around with conspiracy theory here, but maybe they are angry we are now producing boatloads of oil and that is causing downward pressure on world oil prices, and if this continues, along with an Iranian deal (over nuclear issues and stop economic sanctions), the price of oil could drop significantly world-wide.
Okay so, who else might do such a thing? Well, how about Eco-Terrorists? The FBI and DHS say they are a significant threat.
Why would they blow up rail cars here and in Canada? Well, a good many eco-terrorists live in Canada, as a safe haven, and a spectacular accident-looking event could help them stop oil by rail, meaning the oil could not transverse to get to refineries.
Remember they are part of the Global Warming Alarmist alliance, totally against any and all fossil fuels, even natural gas (due to fracking).
They are also prolitically aligned with the Obama Administration an these high-profile accidents help Barack Obama's anti-oil and fossil fuel case.
Who else might do such a thing? Other terrorist groups, proxy Iranian terrorists for instance.
They've already announced their hatred for the US and have said they want to strike our oil assets, they have abroad and we've seen terrorist attacks on oil assets of many of our allies in foreign oil producing nations, and they'd like to strike our banking capital (NYC) and what they believe to be something we need to run our civilization, and in their minds - that's oil - oil and money to be exact.
Please consider all this and think on it.
Well, the other day I was reading Conspiracy Theory Magazine - "they have a magazine for that you ask," yes, indeed they do.
On the first page was a reminder having to do with Ockham's Razor - namely that the highest probability is that the answer to solving any unknown is merely thinking about the most probably and likely explanation.
Sure, but what happens when nothing jives? Ah, this is what makes for the best conspiracy theories because "plausible deniability" goes right the hell out of the window.
Let's talk.
You see, when rail cars full of crude oil explode and blow up, something is amiss.
There was a powerful article in the Wall Street Journal on January 3, 2014 titled; "US Issues Alert On Bakken Crude," by Russell Gold which noted the rail crashes which have occurred, where the rail cars exploded in a big fireball.
There is only one problem with that, they had "crude oil" in them and anyone that knows much about chemistry knows that crude oil doesn't explode, it does burn, but it doesn't explode.
So, why did it explode? Ah, the 64 million dollar question indeed.
You see, I see a conspiracy theory in all of this - namely that there is a bit of terrorism going on here.
But who would do such a thing? Well, how about Al Qaeda? How about wealthy Royal Members of the House of Saud funding proxy Al Qaeda members, they've done it to serve their political will elsewhere.
Okay, well then if so, why would they do that you ask? Well, remember I am just playing around with conspiracy theory here, but maybe they are angry we are now producing boatloads of oil and that is causing downward pressure on world oil prices, and if this continues, along with an Iranian deal (over nuclear issues and stop economic sanctions), the price of oil could drop significantly world-wide.
Okay so, who else might do such a thing? Well, how about Eco-Terrorists? The FBI and DHS say they are a significant threat.
Why would they blow up rail cars here and in Canada? Well, a good many eco-terrorists live in Canada, as a safe haven, and a spectacular accident-looking event could help them stop oil by rail, meaning the oil could not transverse to get to refineries.
Remember they are part of the Global Warming Alarmist alliance, totally against any and all fossil fuels, even natural gas (due to fracking).
They are also prolitically aligned with the Obama Administration an these high-profile accidents help Barack Obama's anti-oil and fossil fuel case.
Who else might do such a thing? Other terrorist groups, proxy Iranian terrorists for instance.
They've already announced their hatred for the US and have said they want to strike our oil assets, they have abroad and we've seen terrorist attacks on oil assets of many of our allies in foreign oil producing nations, and they'd like to strike our banking capital (NYC) and what they believe to be something we need to run our civilization, and in their minds - that's oil - oil and money to be exact.
Please consider all this and think on it.