Last night I was thinking about all this in response to this blog entry. I grant the traditional blogger (!) community everything, but can not abide glib, un-rigorous dismissal of traditional and computer-assisted reporting and investigative skills. (Last year I started writing a monograph on this topic but never finished it — because I had no externally imposed deadline!)

I started trying to come up with questions the answers to which might represent a comprehensive-but-incomplete list of who-does-what work in the new investigative media, a list that—showing my own bias and likely my own ignorance of how far this conversation has traveled—emphasizes the importance of investigation of primary sources as the heart of a democracy's watchdog functions. I live in Washington, DC, and this is DC-centric, but scenarios are fungible to town councils, state governments, the private sector, NGOs, etc.

An SEC commissioner misrepresented climate science in public comments last week about the agency's new climate change risk guidance, which passed by a 3-2 vote.  The measure was put forward to bring greater consistency to companies' risk disclosures about new legislation,regulations, treaties, and physical changes from global warming. [The SEC released the actual guidance [pdf] last night but I haven't had time to read it yet.]

The Commission took no official position on climate science.  But Commissioner Kathleen Casey, who voted against measure, commented on science briefly before declining to comment on it. She said,  in part, "The science surrounding global warming remains far from settled."

Watch Movie Online Free: Carbon Nation Movie Online Free 2011

Watch Now in full HD movie : http://netwebsite.in